Translate this page into:
Advancing flavivirus detection: Role of nanotechnology in eliminating cross-reactivity
*Corresponding author: Yogendra Mathuria, Professor &PI-VRDL, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. ypm.1702@yahoo.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Diksha D, Mishra A, Negi A, Gupta SK, Badoni G, Negi S, et al. Advancing flavivirus detection: Role of nanotechnology in eliminating cross-reactivity. J Lab Physicians. doi: 10.25259/JLP_5_2026
Dear Editor,
Flaviviruses are emerging and re-emerging viruses that exhibit epidemic potential and can cause high mortality and morbidity globally.[1] Flaviviruses are classified as enveloped viruses and have a single-stranded positive-sense genome. These viruses are known to transmit diseases through the bites of mosquitoes and ticks, and these viruses are commonly referred to as arboviruses.[2] Flavivirus consists of a group of medically significant viruses with pathogenic potential, including dengue virus (DENV), Japanese encephalitis, Zika virus, tick-borne encephalitis, and yellow fever virus.[3] Among all flaviviruses, dengue itself has been a significant contributor to the cases, with 505,430 reported dengue cases surging to 5.2 million cases in 2019. In 2023, the highest number of dengue cases was reported, with ~6.5 million dengue cases reported across >80 countries, with 7,300 deaths attributed to the disease.[4] Following the rise in DENV infection, there has also been a notable increase in the number of cases of yellow fever and Zika virus infections. After the DENV, increasing cases of yellow fever and Zika virus infection have also been reported. According to a study, >86,000 cases of yellow fever and 169,734 cases of Zika virus infection have been documented between 2011-2021.[5]
Diagnosis of flavivirus is usually done by identifying the viral antigen, genome sequencing, virus isolation, and various serological assays. In serological tests, immunofluorescent tests, western blots, and immunoglobulin (Ig)M/IgG antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are commonly used techniques.[6] The existence of numerous flaviviruses circulating in endemic places causes cross-reactivity of antibodies, which is one of the main issues faced during serological testing for flaviviruses.[7] Because the immune system can develop primary and secondary antibodies that react with different flaviviruses, this cross-reactivity makes identification more difficult. Serodiagnosis thus becomes challenging and prone to errors. Particularly in regions where many flaviviruses are co-circulating, false-positive results might happen, making it more difficult to differentiate between infections.[7]
Nanotechnology can be used as a key tool in addressing the problem of flavivirus cross-reactivity by removing false positives, especially in endemic regions where several flaviviruses are common. Nanotechnology-based solutions are gaining significant attention due to their improvements in sample volume, rapid detection capabilities, and the ability to detect analytes in unusable samples.[8] The use of nanoparticles has now been widely employed to detect infectious pathogens, providing sensitive, rapid, cost-effective, and highly specific results against different pathogens.[9] A previous study demonstrated the gold nanoparticles to detect all four serotypes of the (DENV 1-4) and concluded that these nanoparticles greatly enhance the sensitivity and specificity while reducing the test duration from 1-3 days to <5 min.[8]
The effective use of nanosensors for the rapid diagnosis of the Zika virus was shown in a study conducted by Banerjee et al.[10] Furthermore, the simultaneous detection of cross-reactive antibodies for the Dengue and Zika viruses is made possible by their magnetic relaxation nanosensors. This invention may be validated for larger samples in endemic regions for quicker identification of pathogens and associated cross-reactive antibodies. Therefore, incorporating nanotechnology-based solutions might greatly improve the quick, cost-effective, highly sensitive, and specific detection of flaviviruses as well as the differentiation of cross-reactive antibodies, particularly in the epidemic region where multiple flaviviruses are prevalent. With this approach, reliable, accurate, and detailed diagnostic outcomes can be achieved that ultimately reduce the chances of misdiagnosis. This, in turn, supports effective disease management where the patient receives the correct diagnosis and aids clinicians in making informed decisions to improve the patient outcome and lastly restrict the spread of disease through proper identification and targeted interventions.
Author’s contributions:
DD: Conceptualization, methodology, software,validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing - original draft, Writing - Review & editing,visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition; AM: Resources, writing - original draft; AN: Project administration; SKG: Writing - Review & editing, supervision; GB: Writing - original draft; SN: Software; YM: Supervision, project administration.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- The importance of viral and cellular factors on flavivirus entry. Curr Opin Virol. 2021;49:164-75.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flaviviruses: Yellow fever, Japanese B, west nile, and others In: Viral Infections of Humans: Epidemiology and Control. Boston: Springer; 2014. p. :383-415.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Challenges in direct detection of flaviviruses: A review. Pathogens. 2023;12:643.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 29]
- The global incidence and trends of three common flavivirus infections (Dengue, yellow fever, and Zika) from 2011 to 2021. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1458166.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serological cross-reactivity among common flaviviruses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:975398.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flavivirus cross-reactivity: Insights into e-protein conservancy, pre-existing immunity, and co-infection. Microbe. 2024;4:100105.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- An easy way to detect dengue virus using nanoparticle-antibody conjugates. Virology. 2018;513:85-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nanotechnology-based analytical approaches for detection of viruses. Anal Methods. 2017;9:2375-91.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rapid detection and one-step differentiation of cross-reactivity between Zika and dengue virus using functional magnetic nanosensors. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4:3786-95.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
