Bloodstream infections and trends of antimicrobial sensitivity patterns at Port Blair

Introduction

Blood is a connective tissue which is indispensable for proper functioning and survival of human life. From providing nutrients, limiting/clearing pathogens, perfusing and ventilating organs, clotting wounds, removal of toxins and chemicals, dissemination of hormones and drugs throughout the body it performs a pivotal role in body defense and survival. Blood is considered to be a sterile fluid unless proved otherwise. Invasion of the bloodstream by microorganisms constitutes one of the most serious situations in infectious disease. Microorganisms present in circulating blood whether continuously, intermittently, or transiently are a threat to every organ in the body.[1] Clinical presentation ranges from benign transient bacteremia with little or no symptoms to fulminant septic shock with high mortality.[2] Bloodstream infections (BSIs) have serious consequences such as shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiple organ failure, and even death. Early diagnosis plays a crucial role in managing BSI, and hence, prompt detection of such infections is a critical function of clinical microbiology laboratories. Blood culture is a vital tool for the detection of BSI and remains the gold standard for bacteremia detection. Empiric antimicrobial therapy is based on knowledge of the microbial profile and their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns, clinical and epidemiological data. Irrational use of drugs has led to an increase of multidrug-resistant bugs and thus worsened the condition.[1] Prevalence and susceptibility patterns of microorganism vary according to geography and even within the same hospital with time. Andaman and Nicobar Islands (A and N islands) are a group of islands in Ritchie's Archipelago situated far away from the Indian mainland which bear strikingly different topography, climatic conditions, and a plethora of different ethnicities living together. With the background of no such information from these islands; the current study intends to report the prevalence, bacteriological analysis of microorganisms and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of blood culture isolates from the main referral hospital at Port Blair in the A and N islands.

Materials and Methods

The present study is a retrospective observational analysis of blood culture isolates received in the Department of Microbiology, G B Pant Hospital attached to Andaman & Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair, from May 2015 to February 2017. Records of all such cases were perused from the medical records section of the hospital and analyzed for inclusion in the study.

Results

A total of 1895 consecutive samples were received from different wards and Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of the hospital. Positive aerobic bacterial growth was observed in 270 (14.24%) isolates. Thirty-one isolates (1.63%) were contaminants recovered during culture of samples. The number of pathogens recovered in each of the 22-month long study period is presented in Table 1. The age and gender distributions of the population suffering from bacteremia are described in Table 2. The mean age of patients was 15.97 ± 20 years (range 0–86 years). Gender-wise ratio of 1.23:1 was observed skewed in favor of males. From 270 isolates recovered from patients, the spectrum of microbes included 163 (60.37%) Gram-positive cocci (GPC), 98 (36.29%) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and 9 (3.33%) isolates of Yeasts. S. aureus was the predominant pathogen isolated from bacteremia cases followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) and Acinetobacter spp. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns for GPCs and GNBs were interpreted according to prevalent CLSI guidelines,[3] and are represented in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Similar antifungal susceptibility profile is represented in Table 5.

Table 1 Trend of pathogens recovered in each month

Table 2 Age and gender distribution of bacteremia cases

Table 3 Drug-sensitivity profile of Gram-positive isolates (%)

Table 4 Drug sensitivity profile of Gram-negative isolates (%)

Table 5 Drug-sensitivity profile of fungal strains (%)

Discussion

BSI is a challenging problem, and sometimes, it may be life-threatening; therefore, timely detection, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blood-borne pathogens are one of the most important functions of diagnostic microbiology laboratory.[1] There exists a strong relationship between delay in effective initiation of therapy and in-hospital mortality of septic shock. Each hour of delay in therapy initiation is associated with an average decrease in survival of 8%.[7] This study is an attempt to analyze the bacterial profile of blood culture isolates, assess antimicrobial trends, correlate bacteremic source, and their impact which may help us devise the best ways of managing BSIs.

In the present study, the culture positivity was 14.24%. This rate of isolation is consistent with many studies from India[891011] and abroad.[1213] High culture positivity ranging from 33.9% to 52.10% were reported by various other authors.[1415] Such variation in blood culture positivity can be explained by various factors such as volume or the number of blood culture samples taken for study as explained by Lee et al.[16] All the cultures in our study yielded monomicrobial growth.

Although the mean age of patients was 15.97 years, bacteremia cases were commonly isolated from 1 to 5 year age group (24.81%) followed by those < 1 year (23.70%). Even though cumulatively males outnumber female bacteremia patients across all age groups, in our study, there were more frequent bacteremia cases noted from female neonates rather than males. Same was true for the 21–30 age group. This may be explained as men are involved in more physical activities for livelihood which predisposes them for BSI as well as they are more privileged to visit physician chamber for treatment in the Indian society.

A total of 31 isolates (1.63%) of contaminants were isolated in the concurrent study. The rate of contamination observed is below the target level suggested by Hall et al.[6] This correlates well with other studies by Archibald et al.[17] and Weinstein.[18]

In the present study, bacteremia due to Gram-positive pathogens was more common when compared to Gram-negative pathogens. This fact is corroborated by other studies as well.[192021] More than half (54.81%) of all sepsis cases were caused by Staphylococcus spp. S. aureus was the predominant pathogen (40.7%) recovered. Pre-eminence of S. aureus as a blood stream pathogen has been documented by numerous similar studies.[91921] Among these isolates, majority (~59%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and rest 41% were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). These figures are hardly comforting because rise in the incidence of MRSA sepsis cases spells doom for effective management of BSIs. These organisms are notorious since they do not respond to the broad class of beta-lactam antibiotics and acquire resistance to newer antibiotics quite rapidly. This effectively complicates the management of such BSIs. Over the past two decades, CoNS, the usual skin commensals are increasingly being considered bloodstream pathogens in select settings. Improper methods of blood collection and the presence of long-standing intravascular catheters are recognized as possible modes of spread of BSI by CoNS. In fact, two studies[822] reported CoNS as the most common isolate causing BSIs in ICU patients. CoNS, was the second most common isolate causing sepsis in our study as well.

Among Gram-negative pathogens, Enterobacteriaceae as a group accounted for maximum sepsis cases (41/98) with a predominance of Klebsiella species and E. coli. However, as an individual bacterial genus, nonfermenting bacilli Acinetobacter spp. (n = 30) was more predominant. Rather surprisingly, all nonfermenting bacteria combined together accounted for 58.16% of all Gram-negative sepsis. The finding is of significant concern as in the hospital settings, these isolates are associated with a high degree of antimicrobial resistance.[2324]

Among few cases of pyrexia of unknown origin investigated for blood culture, on three occasions Burkholderia pseudomallei and on two instances Salmonella typhi were recovered. Of the melioidosis cases, two were complaining of osteomyelitis and fever and one with multiple discharging sinuses. Typhoid cases were incidental findings in patients investigated for continuous low-grade fever for >7 days.

Fungemia has been documented in nine (3.33%) cases. All of them were due to Candida spp. Two were identified as Candida albicans and seven were nonalbicans Candida. The results were consistent with the study by Karunakaran et al.[25] who reported positivity rate of 3.8% for Candida spp. with a predominance of nonalbicans Candida spp. and with Kohli-Kochhar et al.[26] who reported a rate of 3% for yeast isolates. All fungemia patients were critical and from different ICUs. Risk factors for fungemia include prolonged hospital stay, hyper alimentation, hemodynamic monitoring devices, previous broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, and ulcerations in gastrointestinal mucosa.

An evaluation of the in vitro sensitivity pattern of GPCs was attempted. Within Staphylococcus spp., MRSA were most responsive (100%) to the action of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and chloramphenicol. Gentamicin and levofloxacin were other alternatives. MSSA isolates were highly responsive (>90%) to gentamicin, clindamycin, quinolones, and chloramphenicol besides erythromycin and tetracycline. CoNS infections were amenable to levofloxacin, gentamicin, and chloramphenicol (~90% sensitivity). Enterococcus spp. had mixed sensitivities toward gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline. Ampicillin was however totally effective for Enterococcus spp. Alpha and beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. were uniformly sensitive to penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics.

A similar review of GNBs reveals higher susceptibility for aminoglycosides and carbapenems overall. Cephalosporins were useful for certain bacteria only. For treating BSIs caused by Enterobacteriaceae isolates, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, and gentamicin had ~ 90%–100% sensitivity. Ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins such as cefepime and ceftriaxone were also very good alternatives to treat such cases except those perpetuated by E. coli strains. Treatment of sepsis caused by nonfermenting GNB was more successful when attempted with carbapenems, aminoglycosides, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Pseudomonas spp. isolates were highly responsive toward ceftazidime and cefoperazone. Melioidosis cases were better managed with imipenem, ceftazidime, and chloramphenicol. Regarding fungal isolates, high sensitivity was observed for most antifungals. However, sensitivity for fluconazole was tad low with nonalbicans Candida as expected.

Effective treatment of sepsis hinges on early diagnosis and appropriate and possibly targeted antimicrobial therapy. The choice of antibiotics is based on local knowledge of bacteriological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Beta-lactam drugs are rapidly becoming ineffective for treating BSIs due to indiscriminate and nonjudicious usage. The fact that cephalosporins are one of the most commonly used antibiotics for inpatients as well as for outpatients could be the reason for such high degree of resistance. Hence, rationalization of treatment strategies is very much warranted considering the local trends of BSIs. Poor infection control practices and inappropriate use of antibiotics are main driving forces for the spread of resistant organisms. With the shortage of newer drugs' availability and increasing resistance, use of limited option drugs such as colistin by clinicians could soon lead to the condition of so-called pan-drug-resistance.[10]

Conclusions

The present study provided much-needed information on the prevalence of bacterial pathogens in blood stream infections and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns at Port Blair in A and N islands. Specific antibiotic utilization strategies like antibiotic restriction, combination therapy, antibiotic usage according to the standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antibiotic recycling may help to reduce incidence of blood stream infections as well as prevent the emergence of resistance. Robust infection control practices and antibiotic stewardship programs are prime need of the hour.