Clinical and microbiology profile of typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella blood stream infection: An observational study from a university hospital

INTRODUCTION

Invasive Salmonella infection has emerged as a major public health concern especially in low resource regions.^[1] Poor public health, lack of adequate sanitation, shortage of clean water, and low socioeconomic condition make it endemic in developing countries.^[2,3] Salmonella is the most complex genus of the Enterobacteriaceae family and can be commonly divided into typhoidal (TS) and nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) based on their phenotypes. The predominant organism in South East Asia is Salmonella Typhi^[1,3] while NTS predominates in Africa.^[1,4-8] Clinical manifestation and severity of infection ranges from self-limiting infections to life-threatening sepsis. NTS infection usually produces gastrointestinal symptoms which are usually self-limiting and lasts for 3 to 7 days; however, a small group of patients (immunocompromised individuals, infants, elderly, and patients with underlying disease) may develop invasive blood stream infections (BSIs) necessitating antimicrobial treatment.

As the burden of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella is rising, there is a surge in the multidrug resistance (MDR) and fluoroquinolone resistance infections which lead to adverse clinical outcomes.^[9,10] Changes in the susceptibility pattern for drugs like ceftriaxone and azithromycin is the major concern. Species distribution and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella varies with time and place. Studies from our country have shown that MDR in Salmonella varies from approximately 2 to 4%.^[11,12] Better knowledge of the spectrum and antibiogram of the infective agent of a particular geographical region will aid in the diagnosis and management of patients and will also help in the formulation of hospital antibiotic policy. The present study was undertaken to analyze the clinical profile, treatment, and outcome of patients suffering from Salmonella bacteremia and to examine the species and antibiogram of blood isolates at a tertiary care hospital in North India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Over a period of 2 years (December 2019–December 2021), a total of 28,257 blood samples from patients of clinically suspected septicemia were microbiologically evaluated. Bacterial growth was observed in 1,350 (4.78%) of the cultured samples. Salmonella was isolated from 21 patients. The male to-female ratio of the patients in the study was 2.5:1 and the mean age of the patients was 11.7 years (range 1–27 years). No gender or age group was significantly associated with TS and NTS in the study; however, 71.5% (10/14) of TS was isolated from children (0–10 years) and 85.7% (6/7) NTS was isolated mainly from BSI of young adults (15–30 years) in the study (Table 1).

Of the 21 isolates of Salmonella, Salmonella enterica subspecies serovar Typhi was the most prevalent bacterial isolate (9, 43%), followed by Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis (7, 33.3%) followed by S.Paratyphi A (3, 14%) and S. Paratyphi B (2, 10%) (Figure 1). Among NTS only S. Choleraesuis was isolated in the present study. Immunocompromised states like hematological malignancy, solid organ tumors, autoimmune disorders, or use of anticancer drugs, steroids, or other immunosuppressive agents were present in all NTS and 50% patients of TS (p = 0.0253), but no single comorbid condition was significantly associated with NTS. Fever alone was the most common presenting symptom (19/21) followed by diarrhea (4/21) in both TS and NTS. Total leucocyte count varied from 3,100 to 17,400/μL (mean count = 8,500/μL) in TS patients and 5,600 to 18,900/μL (mean count = 8,100/μL) in NTS patients, respectively. The median time to positivity of blood culture for TS and NTS was 11.2 and 16 hours, respectively, indicating NTS takes more time for growth in blood culture and the turn-around time for culture reports, including antimicrobial sensitivity results, was between 48 and 72 hours.

Close

Figure 1:

Distribution of Salmonella isolates of the study.

Export to PPT

Details of antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates are shown in Table 2. Highest resistance was observed for nalidixic acid (100%, 21/21), followed by ciprofloxacin (76.2%, 16/21) and ampicillin (28.6%, 6/21). MDR was seen in only 14.3% (3/21) of the Salmonella enterica isolates (two S. Typhi and one S Paratyphi B) (Figure 2). Resistance to azithromycin was observed in one XDR isolate which was identified as S. Paratyphi B and this isolate was resistant to all antibiotics except carbapenems.

Close

Figure 2:

Antibiotic resistant pattern of Salmonella isolates of the study. Abbreviations: MDR = Multidrug resistant (resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole); XDR = Extensively drug-resistant (fluoroquinolone non-susceptible, MDR, and resistant to third-generation cephalosporins eg. Ceftriaxone).

Export to PPT

Patients received antibiotic treatment based on clinician’s decision and microbiology laboratory report stating the antibiogram of the organism isolated. Ensuing medication, 95.23% (20/21) patients recovered and one succumbed.

DISCUSSION

Although globally, Salmonella is considered familiar cause of gastrointestinal illness, it is also responsible for a significant number of invasive infections (BSI). Several studies have discussed the association of various pathogens in BSI and the overall morbidity and mortality.^[15] Among the spectrum of pathogens reported from low-resource settings, burden of Salmonella is considerable.^[16-18] In the current study, we were able to identify Salmonella in 1.56% (21/1350) of positive blood cultures. A similar hospital-based study from Delhi which investigated bacterial infection also exhibited a low (3.01%) prevalence.^[19] An African study reported a high 28% (n = 67) positivity in pediatric patients among 242 culture positives which could be attributable to the selection of patients and the study was conducted in more than one hospital.^[20] TS was mainly isolated from blood samples of children (0–10 years) which is in concordance with earlier studies.^[3,6,20]

Small fraction of blood culture positive isolates account for NTS bacteremia. They are considered important among immunocompromised patients especially those suffering from malignancy and immune-deficiency syndrome.^[21] The global burden of invasive disease caused by NTS is substantial as stated by Ao et al in their report.^[22] Moreover, incidence in some regions are higher than expected. A study from Australia demonstrated an annual incidence of 6.5% invasive NTS (iNTS) disease.^[23] Little is known about the incidence of iNTS in Asia.^[24]

It is noteworthy that we were able to isolate and identify 7 (33.33%) NTS in our study. These were more frequently associated with BSI of young adults (15–30 years) which is in contrast to an African study where infants and young children were mainly affected.^[25] Culture-confirmed S. Choleraesuis is the only serovar which was responsible for all the iNTS cases of our study which may be attributable to its highly invasive property as S. Choleraesuis is usually associated with bacteremia and extraintestinal focal infections in both children and adults, with little or no involvement of the gastrointestinal tract.^[26-28] This could also be a possible explanation of the absence of diarrheal history in most cases of iNTS in our study.

The global epidemiology of NTS serotypes causing human BSIs varies greatly in different countries. In subSaharan African countries, S. Typhimurium followed by S. Enteritidis are the two most common serovars associated with bacteremia.^[29] In India, only a few studies and reports have documented the isolation of NTS from blood, with no predominant serotype.^[30,31] S. Choleraesuis has been reported from Thailand^[27,32] and is the second common human Salmonellosis causing serotype in Taiwan.^[26,27] The first case of bacteremia from India was from an adult febrile patient in whom S. Choleraesuis was isolated from both blood and urine cultures.^[31] Recovery rate was good in our study and the death recorded in a patient infected with S. Typhi. Few of the previous studies have discussed high rates of mortality (47%) with NTS bacteremia which could be ascribed to the severity of the underlying disease and the serovars of NTS.^[33]

Nalidixic acid resistance (surrogate marker for fluoroquinolone susceptibility) was present in all our isolates and majority was resistant to ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole, which indicates misuse of these drugs to treat febrile illness of assumed bacterial origin. The isolates were susceptible toward third-generation cephalosporins and azithromycin. S. Paratyphi B showed considerable resistance toward the antibiotics which may be related to extensive use of these drugs leading to the development of resistance.^[34] Rate of resistance among S. Choleraesuis isolates was low, though the isolates exhibited resistance toward ciprofloxacin and ampicillin. MDR was observed in three isolates which is very less compared with previous studies done in India.^[34,35] Salmonella spp. continues to be an important cause of BSI and poses a major health problem. Recently, NTS due to S. Choleraesuis has been identified in immunocompromised individuals suffering from BSIs in Indian subcontinent,^[30,31] so in future more antiseras against it should be kept available in microbiology laboratory. Also, increased occurrence of antimicrobial resistance is a global concern and developing countries are more prone to the catastrophic consequence. Therefore, upgradation in the diagnostic and surveillance system is needed to identify, characterize, capture the true burden and control the BSI, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and NTS, for the better understanding of the epidemiology as it has implication in patient management and formulation of health policy.