Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article in Press
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Report and Review
Case Reports
Case Series
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
How do I do it
How I do it?
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor/Case Reports/Images
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Mini Review
Original Article
Original Articles
Original Research
Other Type
Others
Review Article
Short Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article in Press
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Report and Review
Case Reports
Case Series
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
How do I do it
How I do it?
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor/Case Reports/Images
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Mini Review
Original Article
Original Articles
Original Research
Other Type
Others
Review Article
Short Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
15 (
1
); 45-47
doi:
10.1055/s-0042-1750076

Infection-Related Ventilator-Associated Complication and Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia among Mechanically Ventilated Patients of Adult Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units

Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Department of Hospital Administration, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Department of Infection Control Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Address for correspondence: Bijayini Behera, MD, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences [AIIMS] Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019, India (e-mail: drbinny2004@gmail.com).
Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objective

An observational study was conducted to evaluate (1) the incidence rates of infection-related ventilator-associated complication (IVAC) and possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) among mechanically ventilated patients of adult medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) and (2) the pathogen distribution in patients with PVAP.

Materials and Methods

The IVAC and PVAP rates of medical and surgical ICUs, between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2021, per 1,000 mechanical ventilator (MV) days were calculated. The significance of difference in IVAC and PVAP rates between medical and surgical ICUs was calculated. The level of significance was set at less than 0.05.

Results

MV utilization ratios of adult medical and surgical ICUs were 0.32 and 0.26, respectively (p < 0.001). About 8 and 7 episodes of IVAC and 14 and 6 episodes of PVAP were reported from adult medical and surgical ICUs, accounting for IVAC rates of 3.17 and 1.8 per 1,000 MV (p > 0.05) and PVAP rates of 2.46 and 1.59 per 1,000 MV days in medical and surgical ICUs, respectively (p > 0.05). Acinetobacter baumannii complex either singly or in combination was isolated in 11/20 PVAP cases.

Conclusion

IVAC and PVAP were more in medical compared with surgical ICUs. The most common pathogen in patients with PVAP was A. baumannii complex. More studies are warranted to monitor the significance of ventilator-associated event on patient outcomes.

Keywords

ventilator-associated events
infection -related ventilator-associated complication
possible ventilatorassociated pneumonia
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN)
adult medical and surgical intensive care units

Introduction

Surveillance of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to be challenging in intensive care unit (ICU) settings and has been a debated issue since long. Prior to 2013, the surveillance of VAP was based on a combination of clinical signs, chest radiography, and microbiological data.[1] This definition has since been found to be neither sensitive nor specific for VAP, and hence, was deemed unsuitable for surveillance purposes. In 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) developed new surveillance definitions for surveillance of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) in adult medical and surgical ICUs in an attempt to promote surveillance in a uniform and consistent manner.[2] In the CDC-NHSN three-tiered VAE algorithm, ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are defined by an increase of more than 3 cm of H2O from daily minimum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or an increase of more than 20% in the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2).[2] Infection-related VAC (IVAC) is defined by VAC with inflammatory signs and use of new antibiotics for more than 4 days, and possible VAP (PVAP) is defined by IVAC with microbiological evidence of pneumonia.[2] This definition was adopted at our adult and medical surgical ICUs for routine surveillance of VAE. We undertook an observational study over 4 years with aim to evaluate the following: (1) the incidence rates of IVAC and PVAP among mechanically ventilated patients of adult medical and surgical ICUs and (2) the pathogen distribution in patients with PVAP.

Method

In this study, patients admitted to various adult medical and surgical ICUs, between July1, 2017, and June 30, 2021, and had at least 4 days on mechanical ventilation were included. The mechanical ventilator (MV) utilization ratio of medical and surgical ICUs was calculated. The IVAC and PVAP rates of medical and surgical ICUs, per 1,000 MV days were calculated. Patients requiring progressive increases in FiO2 or PEEP from intubation without subsequent stabilization were excluded. Patients who succumbed within 2 calendar days of MV were also excluded. Three-tier VAEs algorithm according to the definition of CDC-NHSN was implemented and VAE Calculator, version 7.0 was used for VAE stratification. To make a diagnosis of IVAC, first, VAEs were captured by using CDC-designed software in which the lowest FiO2 and the lowest PEEP of all invasively ventilated patients were listed. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA)/bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were collected as per protocol. ETA and BAL were subjected to Gram staining and semiquantitative culture. Presence of greater than or equal to 25 neutrophils and less than or equal to 10 squamous epithelial cells on sputum microscopy was considered as significant. Significant growth in respiratory samples was stratified as follows: endotracheal aspirate (ETA) 105 CFU/mL, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) 104 CFU/mL. Patients with IVAC or PVAP were not mutually exclusive. For example, patients in the PVAP group were all included in IVAC.

Results

The MV utilization ratio of adult medical and surgical ICUs was 0.32 and 0.26, respectively (p < 0.001). Eighteen and 7 episodes of IVAC were reported from adult medical and surgical ICUs, accounting for IVAC rates of 3.17 and 1.8 per 1,000 MV (p > 0.05). Fourteen and 6 episodes of PVAP were reported from adult medical and surgical ICUs accounting for PVAP rates of 2.46 and 1.59 per 1,000 MV days in medical and surgical ICUs, respectively (p > 0.05). A single pathogen was isolated in 15 out of 20 cases of PVAP, whereas rest of the five cases had two pathogens. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii complex and Klebsiella pneumoniae (retaining susceptibility to only tigecycline and colistin) either singly or in combination were isolated from15 out of 20 cases. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, either singly or in combination, was isolated from 6 out of 20 cases. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were isolated from one case each. The total MV days, MV utilization ratio, incidence rates of IVAC and PVAP, and mortality among mechanically ventilated patients of adult medical and surgical ICUs is depicted in Table 1. The variables are denoted as n (%) and compared by using the chi-square test. p-Value of 0.05 or lower was used to ascertain statistical significance.

Table 1 Total MV days, MV utilization ratio, incidence rates of IVAC and PVAP, and mortality among mechanically ventilated patients of adult medical and surgical ICUs
Medical intensive care unit Surgical intensive care unit p-Value
Total MV days 5,671 3,762 < 0.001
Total patient days 17,597 14,448
MV utilization ratio 0.32 0.26
Total IVAC (n) 18 7 > 0.05
IVAC/1,000 MV days 3.17 1.8
Total PVAP (n) 14 6 > 0.05
PVAP/1,000 MV days 2.46 1.59
Total death in patients who developed IVAC or PVAP 13 (72.2%) 2 (28.5%) < 0.05

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; IVAC, infection-related ventilator-associated complication; MV, mechanical ventilator; PVAP, possible ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Discussion

In our study, the incidence rates of IVAC and PVAP were higher in medical ICUs compared with surgical ICUs, though the difference was not statistically significant. In a recent Indian study, more VAE cases (62.1%) were reported from medical ICU as compared with surgical ICU.[3] On further stratification of the VAE cases, incidences of VAC and IVAC was almost similar in medical and surgical ICUs; however, the incidence of PVAP between medical ICU (9.1/1,000 ventilator days) as compared and surgical ICU (1.45/1,000 ventilator days), was statistically significant (p = 0.0044).[3] Our IVAC and PVAP rates over 4 years is less than that reported by Sharma et al as well as from other international studies by Apisarnthanarak et al and Dallas et al.[3,4,7] In a study from Thailand, incidence of VAP in the medical ICU was higher compared with the surgical ICU (20.6 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days vs. 5.4 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days).[4] In few studies from western countries, the incidence rates of IVAC and PVAP have been reported to be more in surgical ICUs compared with medical ICUs. In a previous large-scale, retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary, academic center in 2013, the proportion of IVACs ranged from 29% in medical units to 42% in surgical units.[5] Another study from Japan, also reported higher incidences of three VAEs subtypes (VAC, IVAC, PVAP) in ICUs with large proportion of surgical patients.[6] In a study from United States by Dallas et al, surgical ICU patients had higher rates of VAP compared with medical ICU patients (13.6 per 1,000 ventilator-days vs. 4.8 per 1,000 ventilator-days).[7] In our study, MV utilization ratio in medical ICUs was significantly higher compared with surgical ICUs (p < 0.001). This could be one of the reasons of higher infectious complications in adult medical ICUs. In our study, IVAC and PVAP were associated with increased risk of mortality, and mortality was significantly higher in medical ICUs compared with surgical ICUs. In a recently published study, the hospital mortality among patients with all three VAEs subtypes (VAC, IVAC, PVAP) was more than three times of those with non-VAEs.[8] In our study, XDR A. baumannii complex (retaining susceptibility to only tigecycline and colistin) either singly or in combination were isolated from 11 out of 20 cases. Similar to our findings, the most common pathogen in patients with PVAP was A. baumannii, in the study by He et al.[8] A notable finding of our study was total absence of Gram-positive organisms as causative agent of VAP, whereas in a previous study, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 29% of cases.[5] This study helps to give a preliminary idea regarding the incidence and microbiological etiologies of infectious complications of mechanical ventilation. We would like to highlight the limitations of our study. Our findings are based on data from one tertiary hospital, which may not be generalizable to other settings. Multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, unit type, and other risk factor analysis, as well as inclusion of controls (selected from among ventilated patients for at least the number of days as matched to cases as per days to VAE onset) could have helped us calculate the attributable mortality risk. More Indian studies are warranted to monitor VAE and its clinical significance on patient outcomes.

Authors' Contributions

B.B. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, data curation, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing, supervision, and project administration. A.M. contributed to the data curation, writing - review and editing, supervision, and project administration. J.S.K. contributed to resources, supervision, and project administration. J.J. contributed to methodology and project administration. J.R., J.B., C.S., R.P., and M.K. contributed to formal analysis, data curation, and writing - review and editing.

Note

The work was presented as chaired poster in the XVII Annual Conference of Hospital Infection Society of India. HISICON 2021. The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee, Number T-EM-F/Micro/16/27.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. , , . CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309-332.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al. Developing a new, national approach to surveillance for ventilator-associated events. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2467-2475.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , et al. Ventilator-associated events: Incidence and mortality in intensive care unit of a super specialty hospital of north India. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2020;9:62-66.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , et al. Effectiveness of an educational program to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in a tertiary care center in Thailand: a 4-year study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:704-711.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Descriptive epidemiology and attributable morbidity of ventilator-associated events. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:502-510.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al. Ventilator-associated events: prevalence and mortality in Japan. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:6942-6949.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in a mixed surgical and medical ICU population. Chest. 2011;139:513-518.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , et al. The epidemiology and clinical outcomes of ventilator-associated events among 20,769 mechanically ventilated patients at intensive care units: an observational study. Crit Care. 2021;25:44. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851639/
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections